Americans Urge New Congress to End Iran Conflict and Repeal Trade Tariffs
# Public Demand for Policy Shift as Democrats Prepare to Lead Congress
**WASHINGTON D.C.** — A comprehensive new survey conducted by Reuters and Ipsos has highlighted a significant wave of public discontent regarding current U.S. foreign policy and trade strategies. The data suggests that a broad majority of the American population is looking toward the incoming Democratic-led Congress to dismantle several key pillars of the Trump administration's agenda, specifically focusing on the ongoing conflict with Iran and the imposition of aggressive import tariffs.
### A Call for Peace in the Middle East
According to the four-day poll which concluded on November 10, there is an overwhelming appetite for a diplomatic resolution to the hostilities in the Middle East. Approximately 71% of all respondents expressed a desire for Congress to pass legislation that would effectively end the war between the United States and Iran—a conflict that was initiated in February by the Trump administration in coordination with Israel.
What is perhaps most striking is the level of consensus across party lines. While the sentiment is nearly universal among Democrats, with 93% supporting an end to the war, it has also crossed over to a majority of Republicans, with 51% agreeing that the conflict should be terminated. This shift in opinion is largely attributed to the tangible economic repercussions of the war, as geopolitical instability in the region has led to a spike in global fuel prices, which in turn has exacerbated domestic inflation and strained household budgets.
### Trade Tensions and Economic Pressure
Beyond foreign military intervention, the survey indicates a strong preference for a reversal of the current trade regime. Roughly 62% of participants voiced their support for the repeal of import tariffs implemented by the Trump government. These tariffs, designed to protect domestic industries, have instead become a point of contention for consumers who have felt the pinch of rising costs for imported goods.
President Trump, however, remains steadfast in his defense of these policies. The administration argues that the tariffs serve as a vital shield for American domestic industries, preventing them from being undercut by cheap foreign imports and thereby stimulating the growth of national industrial capabilities. Regarding the military intervention in Iran, the President has maintained that such actions were a strategic necessity to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons, framing the war as a preventative measure for global security.
### The Democratic Agenda and the 'First 100 Days'
With the new Congress scheduled to be sworn in on January 3, the Democratic Party finds itself in a position of significant influence. Democratic leaders have already signaled that their primary objective will be addressing the "cost of living" crisis. They have pledged to prioritize legislation that eases financial pressure on the average citizen and have indicated they will use their legislative leverage to compel the President to cease military operations in Iran.
The urgency of these economic concerns is reflected in the poll's findings regarding legislative priorities. An astonishing 90% of respondents believe that the new Congress should place the cost of living at the absolute forefront of its agenda during its first 100 days in office. This focus on immediate economic relief far outweighs other contemporary political debates; issues such as the regulation of artificial intelligence, immigration reform, and climate change—while important—received significantly lower levels of priority from the general public.
### A Desire for Bipartisanship
Despite the stark political divisions of the era, the survey reveals a surprising yearning for cooperation. A vast majority of respondents from both political parties believe that it is essential for President Trump to work collaboratively with the Democratic leadership of the new Congress. This suggests that the American public is less interested in ideological warfare and more concerned with pragmatic governance that can deliver stable prices and international peace.